Summer 2010 / No. 84
Product Trends in the Voluntary Market
By Bonnie Brazzell
In our recent bi-annual Product Trends Frontline Report,
carriers indicated that the most pronounced product trends were
liberalization of underwriting guidelines. Specifically, the responding
carriers believe there is a trend towards more guaranteed issue
and lower participation requirements. Respondents also mentioned
seeing a tendency towards more features and options in voluntary
plans. The following chart gives the full results.
Most Pronounced Product Trends
Answer Options |
Percent |
| More guaranteed issue |
58% |
| Lower participation requirements |
53% |
| More features and options |
45% |
| Lower prices |
29% |
| More use of shelf rates |
29% |
| Higher initial compensation/commissions |
18% |
| Fewer age bands |
18% |
| Higher renewal compensation/commissions |
13% |
| More age bands |
8% |
| Fewer features and options |
8% |
Respondents also indicated similar feelings when asked about
the greatest pressures concerning voluntary products. Pressure
to liberalize guaranteed issue guidelines was the most common
response. In fact, 43 percent of the carriers felt this was the
area of the greatest pressure. Most (65 percent) indicated that
the pressure is coming primarily from brokers/producers as opposed
to customers or the company’s field staff.
The following chart shows the full results.
Areas of Greatest Pressure
Area |
Percent |
| Pressure to liberalize guaranteed issue guidelines |
43% |
| Pressure to lower prices |
18% |
| Pressure to increase compensation/commissions |
18% |
| Pressure to improve/update features and benefits |
13% |
| Pressure to increase coverage levels |
5% |
| Other |
5% |
Other key findings of the Product Trends survey include:
• Sixty-six (66) percent of the respondents plan to introduce
new products in 2010.
• When asked if the volume of takeover business in the voluntary
market has changed, 61 percent said it has increased (with five
percent saying it has increased significantly).
• The three products with the highest percentage of carriers
rating them as “very profitable” included AD&D,
accident, and universal or whole life.
• The top three growth products (over the next 2-3 years)
that carriers expect for their own companies were accident, short-term
disability, and critical illness insurance.
• At the industry level, the expected growth products included
accident and critical illness as above but tied for third was
supplemental medical plans and universal life.
The Product Trends Frontline Report is conducted
bi-annually by Eastbridge. The report is only available to Information
Partner companies and participants. Call us to get on the list.
What Differentiates Us?
By Gil Lowerre
One critical aspect of strategy creation is the identification
and development of meaningful differentiation. What makes us different?
What compelling reasons do brokers have for switching carriers
and bringing their voluntary/worksite business to us?
Our clients know that our research efforts were founded at their
request, designed to support our strategy and operational consulting
efforts. And as you’d expect, differentiation has been a
recurring topic of our studies. At a high level, here’s
the scorecard.
What doesn’t differentiate us?
Basic administration. Basic functions, like
underwriting, issue, billing and claims, all qualify as hygiene
factors. They are expected by producers. No one will switch to
your company because you’re good at them; brokers will leave
you if you aren’t.
However, the quality of a carrier’s
administration is a delicate issue. Competence at performing the
basic functions is expected, and therefore, not differentiating.
And yet, adding exceptional functions: broker business data, re-enrollment
processes, payroll and HRIS capabilities, can be. The key issue
is straightforward: do not spend more on basic administration
than required. It won’t get you anything. The challenge
is more subtle: which enhancements are worth investment because
they are truly differentiating?
Commissions. Leadership in this area is only
differentiating to a minority of producers. Other issues trump
commissions. And for those who look at compensation first, you’re
either a “high” commission company or you are not.
If you are, you’re in the running, but brokers will still
weigh other issues before selecting the high commission company
they’ll use. In other words, if you pay high commissions
in order to compete for the minority of producers for whom that
is a key in their decision-making, it still is the other things
that will drive their final decision.
What does differentiate us?
Services. Service to employers, employees, and
especially to brokers is key. This includes job aids, personalized
support, responsiveness, resources (like web access to tools and
data), etc.
People. Higher quality staff builds higher quality
relationships. And relationships build business. We all know about
a major carrier who went through a wrenching two-year downgrade
but barely lost momentum. And they lost few staff—and fewer
brokers—and have since picked up right where they left off.
Relationships rule.
What about products?
Products. These can have differentiating power,
but only for a few carriers and only for a limited period of time.
If you want to be an industry leader in a product line, you can
attract production, but consistent product leadership is expensive.
One goal of strategy creation is to design a services platform
that is exceptional in ways that are meaningful to producers,
while building the highest quality staff possible. And if there
are real product design or compensation opportunities, that’s
a bonus. The creative part is defining what these mean in operational
terms.
For more information on Eastbridge’s strategy creation process,
email us at info@eastbridge.com.
Voluntary Sales Grew In 2009
Eastbridge’s annual U.S. Worksite Sales Report for 2009
was released several weeks ago and, despite the recession, the
results show that the voluntary market continues to grow.
New voluntary sales (U.S.) totaled an estimated $5.397 billion
in 2009, an increase of 3.3 percent over 2008 results. The following
graph shows the sales results since 1997.
New Business Annualized Premium
(in Millions)
Eighty (80) percent of total voluntary sales were
from the industry’s top 15 companies. These 15 companies
had an average growth rate of 3.1 percent, slightly below the
industry results. However, 10 of the top 15 had sales increases
with five of the companies having double-digit increases ranging
from 14 percent to 34 percent.
Inforce premium increased just under 8 percent
in 2009, bringing the estimated total inforce premium for voluntary
between $18.8 and $24.7 billion.
Life insurance sales had the top market share for
the year. New life sales were $1.3 billion for the year, up about
14 percent over 2008. Term life generated the most sales premium
in 2009 with over $940 million, up almost 21 percent over 2008.
Universal life and whole life sales were basically flat with $371
million.
Disability products accounted for the next largest
share of voluntary sales, coming in at 20 percent of the total.
Sales for disability products were actually down in 2009 as compared
to 2008. Total voluntary disability sales were just under $1.1
billion, down six percent.
Accident sales accounted for 13 percent of total
voluntary sales as did the hospital indemnity/supplemental medical
line. These lines were followed by cancer and critical illness
with a combined market share of 12 percent.
By platform, the industry continued to move towards
a group platform. In 2009, the growth rate for group product sales
was 6.7 percent, significantly higher than the almost flat individual
sales that were up by just 0.2 percent. This resulted in group
products increasing their share of total voluntary sales to 49
percent, up from 48 percent in 2008.
When looking at voluntary sales by distribution
channel, Benefit Brokers again accounted for the largest portion
of worksite/voluntary sales. According to the study, this segment
generated 52 percent of 2009 sales—over $2.8 billion of
the $5.397 billion total.
The following chart shows the share of sales for
each distributor segment and the segment’s increase over
2008 results.
Segment |
Estimated 2009 Sales |
Inc/Dec Over 2008
|
| Benefit Broker |
$2,826.8 |
18.8% |
| Career Agent |
$1,176.9 |
-27.2% |
| Classic Worksite Broker |
$793.6 |
6.8% |
| Worksite Specialist |
$421.8 |
14.5% |
| Occasional Producer |
$177.9 |
50.1% |
The U.S. Worksite Sales Report is an annual
study conducted by Eastbridge that tracks sales and inforce premium
for the voluntary industry. The report includes detailed sales,
inforce premium, distribution, and product data on the performance
of 60 carriers, both group (voluntary) and individual (worksite)—the
largest number of carriers included in any sales report for the
industry. This year’s study includes data from 1997 through
2009.
If your company did not participate this year,
call us and we’ll put you on the list for next year.
Strong Response to the new PASS Program
In our last issue of Outside Input we told you about our new service designed to help you find out what your brokers think of your voluntary program. We have had a very good response to the PASS™ (Producer Attitude Scorecard ServiceTM) program. As a reminder, the programis an inexpensive and simple way to get information on how you are doing with your brokers.
The PASS Program is designed to offer two advantages over the typical methods of collecting this type of information. First, it allows you to compare what your brokers say about you to what other brokers say about the companies they use.
And second, it allows you to compare your brokers’ current opinions about you with your prior years’ results. In other words, you get two sets of trend information. You can even add customized questions to the survey. And because we are doing it on a large scale, the price is far lower than normal surveys.
In the voluntary market, the first (and probably most intense) point of competition is for the broker. If you haven’t see information on this new service, give us a call.
Strong Response to the new PASS Program
In our last issue of Outside Input we told you about our new service designed to help you find out what your brokers think of your voluntary program. We have had a very good response to the PASS™ (Producer Attitude Scorecard ServiceTM) program. As a reminder, the programis an inexpensive and simple way to get information on how you are doing with your brokers.
The PASS Program is designed to offer two advantages over the typical methods of collecting this type of information. First, it allows you to compare what your brokers say about you to what other brokers say about the companies they use.
And second, it allows you to compare your brokers’ current opinions about you with your prior years’ results. In other words, you get two sets of trend information. You can even add customized questions to the survey. And because we are doing it on a large scale, the price is far lower than normal surveys.
In the voluntary market, the first (and probably most intense) point of competition is for the broker. If you haven’t see information on this new service, give us a call.
OneAmerica: 2009 Growth Company
OneAmerica’s impressive growth rate over the last three
years has propelled the Company to become Eastbridge’s 2009
Growth Company winner. The Company exceeded the industry growth
rate each of the last three years, including better than a 30
percent growth the last two years. Congratulations to the producers,
staff, and leaders at OneAmerica.
Managing in the Dark
Imagine trying to manage a business without knowing how much you’ve
sold, how much it cost you to manage the business, or even whether
the business was profitable.
Today, almost all voluntary executives understand that their
voluntary efforts represent a unique business. It has different
distribution requirements, different dynamics, and different costs
than the traditional employer-paid business. In recognition of
that reality, more group companies, to one degree or another,
are placing responsibility for the success of their voluntary
initiatives under a dedicated executive.
While this makes business sense, it’s hard to understand
that, too often, these executives lack the basic management tools
taken for granted in other business lines. A significant portion
of group voluntary executives cannot measure:
• Their in-force business. Their administrative systems
cannot segregate beyond product type. In other words, employee-paid
and employer-paid business cannot be examined separately.
• Their business costs. Because units are organized functionally,
costs cannot be measured for the voluntary portion of their business.
• Their profits. And, as a result, these executives have
no accurate measure of the profitability of their business.
It’s time to provide voluntary leaders with the basic
management tools we take for granted in the rest of our businesses.
For more information on ways to effectively measure voluntary
results, contact one of our consultants at (860) 676-9633.
Coming Soon: An Update to Our MarketVision™–Employee
Viewpoint
Eastbridge will soon begin solicitations for our new employee
research project. Our last full-scale employee research project
was completed in 2007. The MarketVision™—Employee
Viewpoint research is a companion project to our employer
MarketVision study. Both projects provide valuable information
on these important customer groups.
We will be looking for sponsors for the employee project beginning
in late July or early August. A sponsor helps shape the research
and gets exclusive use of the data during the exclusivity period.
This year’s study will update our past findings and also
attempt to look at the buying habits and attitudes of different
segments of employees. Any company sponsoring the study can provide
input into the types of segments that they are interested in as
well as the questions asked in the survey.
Look for more information on this in a few weeks.
To make sure you get on the list to learn more about this
project, call us today.
2020: an Update
In the winter of 2001/2002, Eastbridge wrote a watershed report,
2020: A Clearer Vision of the Future©. This report
presented our consultants’ predictions for the future of
the benefits industry, a picture of what we would look like in
2020. And as many of you know, most of our predictions are coming
true, some quite a bit ahead of schedule. Between that fact, and
the reality that the report is now almost nine years old, we have
received many requests for an updated version.
Our team has been working on this request and by year-end, we
plan to publish an updated version of 2020. At the upcoming VEBB
meeting in Las Vegas, our president, Gil Lowerre, will be reviewing
the major trends and forces on which the update will focus.
We’ll keep you posted on our progress.
Have Critical Illness Sales Finally started
to Gain Ground on Cancer Sales?
For years, people have been predicting that critical illness sales
will eventually replace cancer sales in the voluntary market.
These critical illness advocates believe that the product covers
so much more than cancer and that the total pay-out available
is potentially higher. Additionally, in almost every one of our
Product Trends surveys, carriers have predicted that
critical illness will be a growth product for the industry. Yet,
year after year, cancer sales outpace critical illness sales by
margins of four to one.
But things seem to have changed—at least a little bit.
Voluntary critical illness sales were up in 2009, but cancer sales
lagged. In the 2009 U.S. Worksite Sales Report, critical
illness sales results were up almost 88 percent between 2008 and
2009 as compared to cancer sales which went down almost 8 percent.
This is the second year in a row with significant gains in critical
illness. The increase in 2008 (over 2007) was 19 percent.
Cancer sales in 2009 still exceeded critical illness, but the
differential was down to two to one from the historical levels
of four or more to one. Cancer sales for 2009 were $436 million
and accounted for about 8 percent of total voluntary sales. Critical
illness sales were $225 million and the line increased its share
of total sales from just over 2 percent to slightly more than
4 percent.
We believe that as more and more Benefit Brokers increase the
amount of voluntary sales, we will see more of a move to critical
illness products. Cancer sales will probably never go completely
away as traditional producers will continue to sell the product,
but the sales rate for cancer is likely to decline while critical
illness improves.
Eastbridge recently updated and released the Critical Illness
Spotlight Report. For more information, click
here.
Conservation, Part I
It’s time to begin talking seriously about conservation.
We allow billions of dollars of business to flow off our collective
books every year while ignoring this back-door loss. Our focus
on new sales is understandable, but our willingness to let that
same business walk out the door over the following years is not.
Many of those customers leave us simply because they didn’t
know they had an option. And you can do something about it.
But the reality is that most companies do nothing about this
issue. Our goal is to change that and this is the first part of
a discussion on the topic. This discussion applies to group, as
well as individual companies. The trend towards convertibility/portability
is now clear, and the use of “port pools” by group
companies is becoming more common. Let’s begin with a review
of the subtopics involved.
Individual Retention. For our purposes, individual
retention can be measured as the percentage of (people, products,
or premium) that come off of a list bill that are successfully
moved to another form of premium payment. The average voluntary/worksite
company retains about five percent, by this measure, with a range
from almost nothing to about 10 percent. The five percent that
initiates the process is probably a less than balanced population,
inviting adverse selection, causing you to retain the worst risks.
During a two-year project for one of the largest companies in
the industry, we were able to improve retention to a peak of 28%.
You don’t need to check with your CFO to understand what
an impact that improvement had on company results. And with every
percent improvement in your retention, the pool of converted business
moves closer to the risk profile you priced this business for
in the beginning.
This type of improvement is available to you now. And it is not
the ceiling. Subject to economic issues, only 50 percent of those
who came off list bill were unemployed at the time of lapse. These
are people who sought your coverage, need your coverage, and probably
don’t know they can keep your coverage.
In the next issue, we’ll discuss account-level lapsation
and move on to the issues involved in developing an effective
conservation program. Call us if you’d like more details.
More Employers Offer Voluntary Products
The percentage of employers (with 10 or more employees) offering
at least one voluntary benefit increased by 12 percentage points
between 2006 and late 2009. According to MarketVision™—The
Employer Viewpoint Update©, 66 percent of employers
offer at least one voluntary benefit, up from 54 percent in 2006.
The largest increase occurred in the small employer category
(10-100 employees). While still the least likely to offer voluntary,
the percentage offering at least one voluntary benefit increased
15 points in the most recent survey. Only the 101-500 employee
size group did not show an increase (and the decrease there is
probably not statistically significant). Based on a weighted average
reflecting the actual composition of businesses in the U.S., 66
percent of employers offer at least one voluntary product. The
following chart shows the details by account size.
Employers Offering at Least One Voluntary
Product
|
Percent Offering
2006
|
Percent Offering
2009
|
| 10-100 employees |
50% |
65% |
| 101-500 employees |
79% |
77% |
| 501-2,000 employees |
72% |
78% |
| 2,001 or more employees |
80% |
87% |
| Average for all U.S. employers with 10 or more employees |
54% |
66% |
The recently released study also found that:
• Despite the current economy, some employers
are looking to add benefits.
• Web use for “employee self-service”
tools continues to increase.
• The influence of the broker seems to be
increasing.
• The most common method of enrollment remains
self-enrollment on paper, but self-enrollment via a website is
gaining ground.
The study results are based on quantitative interviews
with plan administrators in accounts ranging from 10 to more than
5,000 employees. Other topics covered include:
• Types of benefits (voluntary and employer-paid)
employers offer
• Market penetration of voluntary products
by employer size and product
• Factors considered by employers when choosing
a voluntary carrier
• Role advisors (i.e., brokers) play in the
decision-making process
• Enrollment methods allowed by employers
In addition, the study compares current employer
attitudes with those reported in earlier MarketVision™
studies completed in 2002 and 2006.
The report is now available. For more information
click
here. To purchase the report, call (860) 676-9633 or email
info@eastbridge.com.
The New Enrollers
Enrollers are a critical part of the voluntary industry. Independent
enrollers work for multiple companies but at each individual location,
they are often the face of the carrier to both the employer and
the employees. Do you know what these important people think?
If not, check out the newest Eastbridge Spotlight report, The
New Enrollers: What You Need to Know. The report includes
information on:
• How frequently enrollers work
• Who typically contracts the enroller
• What is the typical compensation approach
The report will be released soon and available for purchase
for $2,000. Look for an email announcing its availability.
To pre-order the report, call us at (860) 676-9633.
|